Saaksh
P1-E6Essential indicator

Details of complaints regarding conflict of interest

Number of conflict-of-interest complaints

Code
P1-E6
Section
Section C, principle-wise performance
Principle
Principle 1, Ethics & TransparencyBusinesses should conduct and govern themselves with integrity, and in a manner that is Ethical, Transparent and Accountable
Type
Essential, mandatory for every filer
Unit
count
Usually held by
Company Secretary / Legal
Source
SEBI BRSR Format, and ICAI Background Material on BRSR, Revised Edition 2024, page 90

What SEBI asks, verbatim

Details of complaints regarding conflict of interest

Number of complaints received in relation to issues of Conflict of Interest of Directors and KMPs separately, with remarks, for current and previous FY.

Quoted from the SEBI BRSR Format as amended March 2025, with measurement guidance from the ICAI Background Material on BRSR, Revised Edition 2024, page 90.

In plain English

The report wants you to list how many complaints were received about conflicts of interest involving directors and key management personnel. Include the number for the current year and the previous year, and add a brief note explaining each complaint. You can find this data in the company’s internal complaints or ethics‑compliance records.

What a complete, assurance-ready answer contains

A complete, assurance‑ready answer lists the total number of conflict‑of‑interest complaints received for the current and prior fiscal year, broken down separately for directors and key management personnel. It includes a brief narrative remark for each complaint, indicating whether it was resolved, the outcome, and any remedial action taken. Assurers look for a clear audit trail—dates, complaint sources, and the internal process used to assess and document each case—so the answer should reference the underlying records or system logs that support the figures. A common gap is omitting the resolution status or failing to separate director and KMP complaints, which obscures the granularity required for verification.

Describes the completeness and granularity an assurer expects. No company figures are named.

Where the data comes from

Usually found in board records and compliance registers. Forward to your Company Secretary or Legal team.

Much of what BRSR asks for already exists in filings the company makes elsewhere, such as Pollution Control Board consents, PAT returns, hazardous-waste manifests and EPR registrations. The free gap analysis cross-references those filings against all 108 fields and shows which are already covered.

Frequently asked questions

What does BRSR P1-E6 ask for?

The report wants you to list how many complaints were received about conflicts of interest involving directors and key management personnel. Include the number for the current year and the previous year, and add a brief note explaining each complaint. You can find this data in the company’s internal complaints or ethics‑compliance records.

Is BRSR P1-E6 an Essential or a Leadership indicator?

P1-E6 is an Essential indicator, so it is mandatory for every BRSR filer. It sits under Principle 1, Ethics & Transparency.

Who inside the company holds the data for P1-E6?

Company Secretary / Legal. Usually found in board records and compliance registers. Forward to your Company Secretary or Legal team.

What unit does P1-E6 use?

count. Reporting in the wrong unit, or switching the denominator of an intensity ratio between years, is one of the more common reasons a figure has to be restated.

What does a complete answer to P1-E6 look like?

A complete, assurance‑ready answer lists the total number of conflict‑of‑interest complaints received for the current and prior fiscal year, broken down separately for directors and key management personnel. It includes a brief narrative remark for each complaint, indicating whether it was resolved, the outcome, and any remedial action taken. Assurers look for a clear audit trail—dates, complaint sources, and the internal process used to assess and document each case—so the answer should reference the underlying records or system logs that support the figures. A common gap is omitting the resolution status or failing to separate director and KMP complaints, which obscures the granularity required for verification.

Other disclosures under Principle 1

See P1-E6 against a real client

Describe a client in six fields and get all 108 BRSR disclosures classified as ready to pull, needs verification, or collect fresh, with the calculators built in. Free, no login, and nothing leaves your browser.