Saaksh

Filing & audit tools · on-device

Build the P3 well-being expenditure schedule

BRSR asks for spending on employee well-being as a % of revenue, a BRSR Core assured figure. This maps each welfare head to the P&L line it comes from, so you assemble the number straight from the audited accounts.

  • Each of the 11 welfare heads mapped to the exact ledger line it sits in
  • Download a ready-to-fill schedule with a total and prior-year column
  • Every mapping cited to SEBI BRSR and the underlying labour law

For the consultant assembling the P3 well-being spend from the client's accounts. Maps heads to ledger lines only, no spend-to-emission conversion.

Welfare head → P&L line mapping

Group health / mediclaim insurance

P3, health insurance coverage & well-being spend

Staff welfare, group mediclaim premium

Take annual premium from the insurer's policy schedule; split employees vs workers if the format asks.

Group personal-accident / term-life insurance

P3, accident & life insurance coverage

Staff welfare, insurance

Premium invoices; coverage % of headcount.

Maternity & paternity benefit

P3, parental benefits, return-to-work

Salaries & wages, statutory (Maternity Benefit Act)

Paid-leave cost + any crèche cost recognised separately.

Day-care / crèche facility

P3, crèche availability

Staff welfare, crèche

Own-facility running cost or third-party reimbursement.

Mental-health / employee-assistance programme

P3, well-being measures beyond insurance

Staff welfare, wellness / EAP

Counselling, wellness-platform subscriptions.

Retirement benefits (PF, gratuity, superannuation)

P3, retirement benefits coverage

Contribution to provident & other funds / Gratuity (Ind AS 19)

Employer contribution + actuarial gratuity charge.

ESI contribution

P3, statutory health cover for eligible workers

Statutory contributions, ESI

Employer ESIC contribution from challans.

Canteen / subsidised meals

P3, well-being facilities

Staff welfare, canteen subsidy

Net employer subsidy after recoveries.

Employee transport

P3, well-being facilities

Staff welfare, transport

Bus / cab facility net cost.

Training & skill development

P3, human-capital development

Staff welfare, training & development

External + internal training spend; also feeds P3 training disclosures.

PPE & occupational safety

P3, safe working conditions

Staff welfare, safety / PPE

Safety gear, health check-ups; also feeds P3 safety disclosures.

1. Pull each line from the trial balance / notes to accounts for the reporting FY and the prior FY.

2. Keep employees and workers separate where the BRSR table asks for the split; the same welfare head may sit in more than one cost centre.

3. Sum to a total, then express it as a percentage of revenue from operations, that is the figure the assurer tests.

4. Keep the premium invoices, actuarial valuation and challans; the audit-readiness checklist lists exactly what an assurer asks for.

This maps welfare heads to ledger lines only. It does not attempt any spend-to-emission conversion.

See what an assurer wants alongside this in the audit-readiness checklist, or run the full readiness report.

Why the P3 well-being number matters

Spending on employee well-being reads like a soft disclosure, but under BRSR Core it's an assured percentage that has to reconcile to the audited accounts. Knowing where it comes from is what makes it defensible.

An assured figure

BRSR Core tests spend on employee well-being as a percentage of revenue. It isn't a claim you assert, it's a number the assurer traces back to source, so it has to tie out to the ledger.

It lives in the P&L

Every welfare head is already a cost line in the accounts, PF contributions, insurance premia, gratuity provisions. You're assembling the figure from audited numbers, not estimating it, which is exactly why it's assurable.

Statutory and voluntary heads

Provident Fund, ESI, gratuity and maternity benefit are mandated by law; health insurance, transport, canteen and welfare funds are voluntary. BRSR counts both, and asks for the employees-versus-workers split.