Saaksh
P8-L5Leadership indicator

Details of corrective actions taken or underway, based on any adverse order…

Corrective actions on any disputes involving traditional knowledge

Code
P8-L5
Section
Section C, principle-wise performance
Principle
Principle 8, Inclusive GrowthBusinesses should promote inclusive growth and equitable development
Type
Leadership, voluntary, for filers of three or more years or in the top 1000
Unit
narrative / tabular
Usually held by
CSR team
Source
SEBI BRSR Format, and ICAI Background Material on BRSR, Revised Edition 2024, page 149

What SEBI asks, verbatim

Details of corrective actions taken or underway, based on any adverse order in intellectual property related disputes wherein usage of traditional knowledge is involved

For each case: Name of Authority, Brief of the case, Corrective action taken.

Quoted from the SEBI BRSR Format as amended March 2025, with measurement guidance from the ICAI Background Material on BRSR, Revised Edition 2024, page 149.

In plain English

You must list every intellectual‑property dispute that involves traditional knowledge where a court or regulator has issued an adverse order. For each case, give the name of the authority that made the order, a short description of the dispute, and what steps the company has taken or is taking to fix the problem. This information usually comes from the company’s legal or compliance department.

What a complete, assurance-ready answer contains

A complete, assurance‑ready answer lists every intellectual‑property dispute involving traditional knowledge, with each entry showing the authority (e.g., court, IP office), a concise case summary, and the specific corrective action taken or underway (e.g., license renegotiation, royalty payment, product redesign). Assurers look for consistent formatting, verifiable dates, and evidence that the action resolved the adverse order or mitigated the risk. A common gap is omitting the status of ongoing actions or failing to link the corrective step back to the original adverse order.

Describes the completeness and granularity an assurer expects. No company figures are named.

Where the data comes from

Usually found in CSR spend and project records. Forward to your CSR team.

Much of what BRSR asks for already exists in filings the company makes elsewhere, such as Pollution Control Board consents, PAT returns, hazardous-waste manifests and EPR registrations. The free gap analysis cross-references those filings against all 108 fields and shows which are already covered.

Frequently asked questions

What does BRSR P8-L5 ask for?

You must list every intellectual‑property dispute that involves traditional knowledge where a court or regulator has issued an adverse order. For each case, give the name of the authority that made the order, a short description of the dispute, and what steps the company has taken or is taking to fix the problem. This information usually comes from the company’s legal or compliance department.

Is BRSR P8-L5 an Essential or a Leadership indicator?

P8-L5 is a Leadership indicator, so it is voluntary. Leadership indicators apply to companies that have been filing BRSR for three or more years, or that are in the top 1000 listed companies. A first-time filer can leave it out.

Who inside the company holds the data for P8-L5?

CSR team. Usually found in CSR spend and project records. Forward to your CSR team.

What unit does P8-L5 use?

narrative / tabular. Reporting in the wrong unit, or switching the denominator of an intensity ratio between years, is one of the more common reasons a figure has to be restated.

What does a complete answer to P8-L5 look like?

A complete, assurance‑ready answer lists every intellectual‑property dispute involving traditional knowledge, with each entry showing the authority (e.g., court, IP office), a concise case summary, and the specific corrective action taken or underway (e.g., license renegotiation, royalty payment, product redesign). Assurers look for consistent formatting, verifiable dates, and evidence that the action resolved the adverse order or mitigated the risk. A common gap is omitting the status of ongoing actions or failing to link the corrective step back to the original adverse order.

Other disclosures under Principle 8

See P8-L5 against a real client

Describe a client in six fields and get all 108 BRSR disclosures classified as ready to pull, needs verification, or collect fresh, with the calculators built in. Free, no login, and nothing leaves your browser.